Organizational model: Difference between revisions
imported>Unknown user No edit summary |
imported>Unknown user No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The organization we want to have is a consequence of the type of product, the moment of the company and the objectives. | |||
<span id="factors-for-defining-it"></span> | |||
= Factors for defining it = | |||
We need to evaluate some factors before defining our organizational models. | |||
<span id="product-type"></span> | |||
== Product type == | |||
If the product is lineal and is built by parts, a car for example, every worker has its own individual responsibility on the project. | |||
On the other hand, the product is built from the grouped knowledge of different individuals. | |||
<span id="type-of-client"></span> | |||
== Type of client == | |||
Internet websites are based on Business 2 Clients model. Company offers a solution to the client (exponential growth). | |||
In model Business 2 Business it may happen that we have multiple products to elaborate (linear growth). | |||
<span id="specialization-grade"></span> | |||
== Specialization grade == | |||
It is not the same a product that has a common knowledge that one with very specific knowledge needed. How easy is a profile to assume different positions will define which organizational model will we choose. | |||
<span id="aligned-with-all-departments"></span> | |||
== Aligned with all departments == | |||
Other departments organizational models will affect all the company. | |||
<span id="bus-lottery-factor"></span> | |||
= Bus / Lottery factor = | |||
Avoid [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_factor <u>bus factor</u>], when a person that has all the knowledge doesn't belong anymore to the team. | |||
If bus factor is low (with just 1 person leaving) company suffers. If bus factor is high (needed 4 or 5 people to leave) company has a better resilience in front of workers rotation, delivery and therefore profit. | |||
<span id="maximizing-bus-factor"></span> | |||
== maximizing bus factor == | |||
Role rotating allows that if a role is rotating between different coworkers help to empower and grow the team.<br /> | |||
Rotating people at company level is a good methodology, where coworkers with similar roles can assume the position of other one. | |||
<!-- From bodyContent 1543025.mraw --> | <!-- From bodyContent 1543025.mraw --> | ||
Revision as of 10:57, 19 April 2025
The organization we want to have is a consequence of the type of product, the moment of the company and the objectives.
Factors for defining it
We need to evaluate some factors before defining our organizational models.
Product type
If the product is lineal and is built by parts, a car for example, every worker has its own individual responsibility on the project.
On the other hand, the product is built from the grouped knowledge of different individuals.
Type of client
Internet websites are based on Business 2 Clients model. Company offers a solution to the client (exponential growth).
In model Business 2 Business it may happen that we have multiple products to elaborate (linear growth).
Specialization grade
It is not the same a product that has a common knowledge that one with very specific knowledge needed. How easy is a profile to assume different positions will define which organizational model will we choose.
Aligned with all departments
Other departments organizational models will affect all the company.
Bus / Lottery factor
Avoid bus factor, when a person that has all the knowledge doesn't belong anymore to the team.
If bus factor is low (with just 1 person leaving) company suffers. If bus factor is high (needed 4 or 5 people to leave) company has a better resilience in front of workers rotation, delivery and therefore profit.
maximizing bus factor
Role rotating allows that if a role is rotating between different coworkers help to empower and grow the team.
Rotating people at company level is a good methodology, where coworkers with similar roles can assume the position of other one.